This paper examines the feminist critique of digital consent in India. The study focuses on how the conventional notion of consent fails to account for the nuanced realities of digital interactions, predominantly in the context of gendered power dynamics. The paper critically evaluates India’s emerging data protection framework, including the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act), and its ramifications for consent-based data practices. By employing feminist legal theory, the research unpacks the shortfalls of the ‘opt-in’ consent model in addressing structural inequalities and coercive digital architectures that disproportionately disrupt marginalised groups, particularly women. Through an analysis of case studies, including data breaches and gender-based online surveillance, the paper identifies systemic gaps in current regulatory approaches. It highlights how these gaps perpetuate harms such as surveillance capitalism, digital violence and the erosion of autonomy in online spaces. The findings reveal that prevailing legal mechanisms fail to address the sociocultural and economic contexts that shape women’s digital experiences, often reducing consent to a mere procedural formality. The paper concludes by advocating for a transformative approach to digital consent that integrates intersectional feminist principles. It proposes shifting from individualistic consent frameworks to collective and relational models of agency, highlighting accountability, equitable access and safeguarding vulnerable communities. This reimagining of digital consent has broader implications for global debates on data justice and human rights in the digital age. By contextualising the Indian experiences within the broader feminist critique of technology governance, the article contributes to a critical understanding of how law can better address gendered inequalities in digital ecosystems