Sriramalu, Sudhir Babu, Elangovan, Aravind Raj, Isaac, Mohan K. and Kalyanasundaram, Janaki Raman (2024) Comparison of clinical profile and current status of the treatment nonadherent persons with mental illness: A study from a rural community mental health center in India. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry. ISSN 0971-9962 | 2454-8316 (In Press)
comparison_of_clinical_profile_and_current_status.42.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (789kB) | Request a copy
Abstract
Background:
Treatment nonadherence comprises a combination of individual, family, social, treatment center, and illness-related factors. In this context, the present study aims to compare the clinical profile and the current status of persons with mental illness who have discontinued their treatment at a rural community mental health center (RCMHC) in India.
Materials and Methods:
The persons who discontinued treatment with a diagnosis category of severe mental disorders (SMDs), common mental disorders (CMDs), and substance use disorders (SUDs) who sought treatment at RCMHC are the study population. The present study has followed a comparative research design that compares the clinical profiles of SMDs, CMDs, and SUDs. A survey method of sampling was adopted. A semi-structured interview schedule, clinical global impression (CGI), and errors in drug adherence schedule were used as measures in the study. A home visit approach, telephone contacts, and collateral information were followed to collect the data.
Results:
Out of the 80 respondents, only 16 (20.0%) reported improvement, and the remaining 16 (20.0%) are receiving treatment from various facilities. The rest of the 48 (60.0%) subjects were not on treatment despite being ill. The number of respondents who did not take their medication even for a day was 10 (12.5%), and another 34 (42.5%) subjects completely stopped their medication within a month. CGI-improvement highlights that nearly 47 (58.7%) respondents had shown much and very much improvement while they were on treatment. The CGI-severity of illness rating scale revealed that 54 (67.5%), i.e., nearly 2/3 of the respondents, were currently in the mild-to-extreme mentally ill category.
Conclusion:
Comprehensive psychosocial and community-based approaches will enhance treatment adherence in mental illness.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Clinical profile | Clinical status | Community mental health | Persons with mental illness | Treatment nonadherence |
Subjects: | Social Sciences and humanities > Psychology > General Psychology Social Sciences and humanities > Psychology > Neuropsychology Psychology Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Social Sciences (General) |
JGU School/Centre: | Jindal School of Psychology & Counselling |
Depositing User: | Subhajit Bhattacharjee |
Date Deposited: | 24 Apr 2024 06:52 |
Last Modified: | 24 Apr 2024 06:53 |
Official URL: | https://journals.lww.com/ijsp/abstract/9900/compar... |
URI: | https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/7670 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year