Singh, Aayushi (2021) Deconstructing treaty parallelism and overlap: The infamous “Achilles Heel”. Cambridge International Law Journal, Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 1-4.
Singh2021.pdf - Published Version
Download (139kB)
Abstract
It has been remarked as early as 1991 that texts of international investment agreements (IIAs) differ in many important respects … however, they are also remarkably similar in structure and content – which means that tribunals may work to create a common law of investment protection, with a substantially shared understanding of its general tents. [Asian Agricultural Products Ltd v. the Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3] This substantially shared understanding may of course be jointly distributed among different states who in turn act through multiple ad-hoc tribunals. The multiplicity of tribunals naturally multiplies the number of decision-makers and creates more fragmentation.
Item Type: | Article in News Papers and Magazine |
---|---|
Keywords: | Investment arbitration | Treaty parallelism | Treaty overlap |
Subjects: | Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Social Sciences (General) Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Law and Legal Studies |
JGU School/Centre: | Jindal Global Law School |
Depositing User: | Gena Veineithem |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2022 05:37 |
Last Modified: | 13 Dec 2022 05:37 |
Official URL: | http://cilj.co.uk/2021/05/03/deconstructing-treaty... |
URI: | https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/5142 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year