This paper aims to explore the constitutionality of Article 370 and explore the main argument against the abrogation of the same by doing an in-depth analysis of the basic structure doctrine and the nature of Article 370. This paper will also use constitutional law foundations and principles laid out by the Kesavanada Bharati case and the Golaknath case to prove the given contentions. The paper also aims to analyse and highlight whether the abrogation of Article 370 created a constitutional law precedent for similar sections to be abrogated. This will be done by highlighting the difference in the intention behind both articles in the constitution.