The practices of Special and Ordinary resolutions as envisaged in S.114 of the Company Act, 2013 reflects Democratic arrangements in General Administrative functioning of Company, i.e. the rule of majority. In the legal context, it was the early case of Foss v. Harbottle which established its legitimacy and added that the Courts will not ordinarily intervene in the internal matters of the Company.1 The understanding that all shareholders work towards maximizing the company’s benefit lacks prudency in the practical realm. Decisions are rather based on number of votes received for the proposal, irrespective of the merit in the proposal.