Unconscionability of E-contracts: A comparative study of India, the United Kingdom, and the United States

Prasad, Dharmita and Mishra, Pallavi (2022) Unconscionability of E-contracts: A comparative study of India, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Liverpool Law Review, 43 (2). pp. 339-360. ISSN 0144932X

[thumbnail of Prasad-2022-Unconscionability-of-e-contracts-a-.pdf] Text
Prasad-2022-Unconscionability-of-e-contracts-a-.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (874kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Adhesion contracts have a strong likelihood of being unconscionable. The laws and principles are further complicated by the introduction of electronic contracts, specifically electronic consumer contracts. The paper touches upon the duty to read doc trine in contracts and electronic contracts. While the doctrine of unconscionability has evolved it has been playing catch up with the demands of consumers. This paper compares the application of this doctrine in the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and India. The paper also proposes recommendations for consumers and the development of laws

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Electronic contracts | Consumer contracts | Duty to read | Adhesion | Unconscionability
Subjects: Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Law and Legal Studies
JGU School/Centre: Jindal Global Law School
Depositing User: Amees Mohammad
Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2022 06:54
Last Modified: 22 Feb 2023 09:17
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09306-6
URI: https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/3183

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item