Prasad, Dharmita and Mishra, Pallavi (2022) Unconscionability of E-contracts: A comparative study of India, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Liverpool Law Review, 43 (2). pp. 339-360. ISSN 0144932X
Prasad-2022-Unconscionability-of-e-contracts-a-.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (874kB) | Request a copy
Abstract
Adhesion contracts have a strong likelihood of being unconscionable. The laws and principles are further complicated by the introduction of electronic contracts, specifically electronic consumer contracts. The paper touches upon the duty to read doc trine in contracts and electronic contracts. While the doctrine of unconscionability has evolved it has been playing catch up with the demands of consumers. This paper compares the application of this doctrine in the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and India. The paper also proposes recommendations for consumers and the development of laws
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Electronic contracts | Consumer contracts | Duty to read | Adhesion | Unconscionability |
Subjects: | Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Law and Legal Studies |
JGU School/Centre: | Jindal Global Law School |
Depositing User: | Amees Mohammad |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jun 2022 06:54 |
Last Modified: | 22 Feb 2023 09:17 |
Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09306-6 |
URI: | https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/3183 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year