Being in the field of legal study for about a decade, world peace now sounds like an evasive buzzword, an enigma in itself, in whose pursuit even the most violent endeavour is forgiven. Quite heavily prioritized for global humanity, peace fuels a lot of national and international legal regulations, which brings us to our question: Can peace really be ‘regulated’?2 Experiences in the recent past don’t seem to carry an affirmative answer to that question. In the current political state, strongly driven by ‘security concerns’, peace consists of any state devoid of confrontation. The idea is seductive as it becomes easy to trap the evasive dove of peace in this context by keeping away from conflict, and by extension, keeping away from differences coming together.