Judging the judge: India’s curriculum ban and democratic accountability

Johari, Bhavya ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3639-0118 (2026) Judging the judge: India’s curriculum ban and democratic accountability. Oxford Human Rights Hub, Oxford.

[thumbnail of Judging the Judge.pdf]
Preview
Text
Judging the Judge.pdf - Published Version

Download (178kB) | Preview

Abstract

On February 26, 2026, India’s Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of a grade 8 NCERT textbook chapter titled “Corruption in the Judiciary,” directing seizure of all circulating copies and imposing a blanket publication ban. Two weeks later, on March 11, having recalled 82,440 copies, the Court escalated by ordering: the disassociation of three academics who drafted the chapter from all public educational work without a hearing; that any future curriculum on the judiciary must be approved by a committee including a former judge collaborating with the National Judicial Academy (NJA); and that the government must identify social media accounts that discussed the orders irresponsibly. This blog argues that when courts control what may be taught about the courts, they violate the nemo judex in causa sua principle (no one may judge their own cause), undermining democratic legitimacy.

Item Type: Other
Uncontrolled Keywords: Access to justice | Constitutions and Human Rights | Right to education | Right to freedom of speech and expression | Role of the judiciary | Social protection | Standard of review
Subjects: Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Education Research
Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Law and Legal Studies
Depositing User: Mr. Syed Anas
Date Deposited: 20 Apr 2026 10:17
Last Modified: 20 Apr 2026 10:17
Official URL: https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/judging-the-judge-indias...
URI: https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/11226

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item