Mass tort claims traverse civil, social and cross-jurisdictional justice concerns, posing challenges that traditional tort doctrine and procedural frameworks often struggle to address. India experienced this first-hand when the Bhopal lawsuit was dismissed in the United States. Taking Bhopal as the starting point of Indian mass tort litigation, this chapter asks: How did the Indian legal system respond? Was the response adequate? More importantly, did it evolve to meet subsequent challenges, and if so, how? It undertakes a study of major Indian mass tort cases over the past four decades, tracing the law's evolution and identifying three distinct yet overlapping phases (mid-1980s; late-1980s to late-2000s; 2010–present) and the corresponding three avenues of redress: civil courts, writ jurisdiction, and specialised tribunals. Grounded in access to justice considerations, it critically examines prevailing notions on constitutionalisation of Indian tort law and offers practical guidance for legal systems adjudicating mass torts, the longitudinal lens revealing insights that elude cross-sectional analyses.