The prolonged conflict in Gaza has exposed the deep limitations of existing international mechanisms for conflict prevention, civilian pro-tection, and post-conflict governance. Despite the presence of established in ternational organizations such as the United Nations, the Security Council, and various humanitarian agen-cies, peace has remained elusive. In this context, the idea of a Board of Peace for Gaza, a specialized, conflict-specific body dedicated to ceasefire enforcement, civilian protection, and re-construction, deserves se-rious consideration. When examined through the lens of international organi-zation law, such a Board poses both challenges to traditional institutional models and highlights their failures.