Smart contracts as self- executing agreements coded to blockchain networks introduced major disputes to the existing dispute resolution field. It face problems with traditional arbitration methods because of their decentralized design combined with non- traditional negotiation standards and built- in arbitration clauses in programming code. The research investigates whether programmed arbitration clauses verify valid arbitration agreements along with court treatment of their enforceability across different legal systems. The research investigates the existing jurisdictional obstacles and public policy dilemmas and regulatory void that affect smart contract dispute resolution mechanisms, especially for digital assets and AI dispute settlement procedures. This analysis presents blockchain technology findings combined with arbitration law analysis and regulatory situations whereas it strengthens the general discussion about law and governance in digital transactions.