This Article deals with a very important topic that is relevant to the current world scenario as, in today’s time, not only India but the world is witnessing many different legal cases almost on an everyday basis. This study examines the complex relationship between media trials and the core principles of fair trial rights and judicial independence across different legal systems. As media coverage of high-profile legal cases has increased, concerns have arisen about the potential impact on the integrity of the judicial process. Through a comparative analysis of various jurisdictions, this research sheds light on the multifaceted effects of media trials on the administration of justice. Drawing on legal scholarship, empirical data, and case studies, the study explores how media coverage influences public perceptions, legal proceedings, and the independence of the judiciary. It investigates the challenges posed by sensationalism, bias, and the dissemination of prejudicial information, as well as the implications for the presumption of innocence, impartiality of jurors, and the right to a fair trial. The research examines how regulatory frameworks, media ethics, and legal responses can mitigate the risks associated with media trials. By analyzing comparative data and legal trends, the study aims to identify best practices and policy suggestions to protect fair trial rights and judicial independence in an era of intense media scrutiny. The comparative analysis provides a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics between the media and the judiciary. It offers insights into the challenges and opportunities for preserving the integrity of the legal process as media landscapes and public expectations evolve.