More norms, less justice: Refugees, the republic, and everyone in between

Singh, Prabhakar (2018) More norms, less justice: Refugees, the republic, and everyone in between. Liverpool Law Review, 39 (1-2). pp. 123-150. ISSN 0144932X

[thumbnail of LLR2018.pdf] Text
LLR2018.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (940kB) | Request a copy


The paper argues for conflating refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) as two sides of a work-in-progress postcolonial state. To be sure, aliens, refugees, IDPs, and stateless persons are separate legal entities. Nevertheless, this fragmented normative regime stands testimony to more laws and less justice. Many Asian states have no domestic refugee law. India, a common law system, takes a case by case approach as refugees are given “temporary shelter on humanitarian considerations”. Ironically, a work-in-progress postcolonial state sustains even de jure citizens as de facto stateless persons; the erstwhile Indo-Bangla enclaves for more than half a century were an apt example. Surely, the raison d’être of international law on refugees is to end human suffering, if needed, by transcending the absence of positive laws. A constitutional and political desire to minimise human suffering alone could cut the rigour of such positivist legal narratives. The Delhi High Court seemingly walked that path in Koul v Estate Officer noting “refugees and IDPs appear to be similarly situated”. Rising terrorism has made states increasingly believe in a security narrative all the same. A simultaneous emergence of a demographic anxiety particularly in India’s North-eastern states increasingly pits aliens and refugees against the domiciled indigenous and tribal people.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Aliens | Chakma Doctrine | Indian Constitution | Indian Judiciary | Kashmiri Precedent | Law v.Justice | Refugees
Subjects: Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > International Relations
Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Law and Legal Studies
JGU School/Centre: Jindal Global Law School
Depositing User: Mr Sombir Dahiya
Date Deposited: 22 Dec 2021 06:14
Last Modified: 13 Jan 2022 03:39
Official URL:
Additional Information: This paper is for both Suk, a “happy” Thai Citizen, and So-Tha-Naymoo, a refugee from Myanmar, who, their legal status notwithstanding, share a common lived experience in Bangkok. I thank Arpita Sarkar, Anupama Sharma, Upendra Baxi, Niraja Gopal Jayal, Sonali Singh, B.S. Chimni, Abhimanyu George Jain, Sarbani Sen, Khin Myo Aye, Jessica Field, Sushant Chandra, Aljo Joseph, and Jhuma Sen for comments and conversations. I thank Shravani Joshi Sameer for her excellent research assistance. I am solely responsible for the view expressed.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item