This paper seeks to understand the modern jurisprudence of natural justice under Indian administrative law whilst examining the rule against Bias and its evolution in the Indian context through decided cases. Further it aims to analyse the Indian courts approach/position towards dealing with apparent bias through the application of the ‘real likelihood’ or ‘reasonable-suspicion’ test along with the exception of the ‘Doctrine of Necessity and examine the evolution of the necessity doctrine in the modern Indian judicial discourse with the establishment of the ‘Doctrine of Absolute Necessity’. Through this paper I would further attempt to highlight the Watershed Doctrine i.e. the intertwining of administrative law and constitutional Law in the application of natural justice principles