Khanderia, Saloni
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-555X
(2026)
From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime.
Journal of African Law.
Cambridge University Press
.
ISSN 1464-3731
(In Press)
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855326101089
From Symbolism to Substance.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (427kB) | Preview
Abstract
Despite its strategic role in African and Global South commercial networks, South Africa’s economy lags behind among its BRICS partners and most African peers. Statistics reveal that 44 per cent of foreign judgments are denied recognition in South Africa, primarily due to the rigorous requirements at the enforcement stage, resulting in expensive re-litigation or business discouragement. This article explores how the principle of comity, often used rhetorically by courts, could be transformed into a substantive tool to modernize South African common law. To address the misalignment between domestic rules and global trade, the paper proposes tailoring Canada’s “real and substantial connection” test to suit South Africa’s needs. Finally, to mitigate the risks of enforcing foreign default judgments with tenuous links to the forum, it proposes strengthening the natural justice defence by requiring sufficient notice and evidentiary grounding, as other common law systems have done.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments | International jurisdiction | comity | Real and substantial | Connection | South Africa |
| Subjects: | Social Sciences and humanities > Social Sciences > Law and Legal Studies |
| Depositing User: | Mr. Syed Anas Ali |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Sep 2026 04:02 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Sep 2026 04:02 |
| Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855326101089 |
| URI: | https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/12619 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Dimensions
Dimensions